Johannesburg, South Africa – A growing public petition calling for the removal of popular radio and television personality Minnie Ntuli from the airwaves has amassed over 53,000 signatures as of mid-July 2025, igniting a national debate over ethical broadcasting, media responsibility, and public accountability.
The petition, launched earlier this year on Change.org, gained significant traction following Ntuli’s controversial appearance on The Real Housewives of Durban (RHOD), where she was accused of bullying fellow cast member Londie London.
In a dramatic reunion episode, unseen footage revealed Minnie physically confronting Londie during a group trip — an incident that has since fueled outrage and legal action.
The petition outlines several key concerns:
-
Content Sensitivity: Signatories allege that some of Ntuli’s radio and TV content is inappropriate and offensive, particularly for younger or more conservative audiences.
-
Public Influence: With a significant platform on Gagasi FM and other media outlets, critics argue Ntuli’s actions may set a harmful example.
-
Broadcasting Ethics: Petitioners believe her conduct violates ethical broadcasting standards, citing the RHOD incident as the tipping point.
Adding to the gravity of the issue, Londie London has reportedly filed a lawsuit against Ntuli, alleging both assault and defamation stemming from their RHOD encounter.
Industry Response
While major broadcasters and the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA) have acknowledged the petition, no formal action has yet been taken.
Media experts caution that such decisions involve complex legal and regulatory frameworks, including the protection of free speech and editorial independence.
A spokesperson from ICASA noted that any complaint must follow formal submission procedures and that an investigation would require due process, including hearings and review of all evidence.
Divided Public Opinion
The petition has triggered intense discourse across social media and public forums. Supporters of the petition say Ntuli must be held accountable, especially given her public platform.
On the other hand, critics argue that removing a media figure based on public sentiment may set a dangerous precedent for censorship and media suppression.
“Broadcasting personalities have influence, and with that comes responsibility,” one petition supporter wrote.
“We can’t cancel someone without a fair investigation,” countered another commentator. “We must preserve freedom of expression.”
What Happens Next?
With the petition crossing the 50,000-signature threshold, potential next steps may include:
-
Internal reviews by media houses employing Ntuli.
-
Formal ICASA investigation, if a complaint is officially filed.
-
Engagement with Ntuli and her representatives regarding the public concerns.
Ntuli, who has since issued a public apology and announced a temporary career break for reflection and personal growth, has not explicitly commented on the petition.
However, her recent statements suggest an awareness of the growing scrutiny around her role as a public figure.
Conclusion
The petition against Minnie Ntuli underscores ongoing tensions in South Africa’s media landscape, where public accountability, ethical standards, and personal freedom collide.
As the story continues to unfold, all eyes remain on broadcasters, regulators, and Ntuli herself to see what actions, if any, will follow.
