Kim Kardashian sued over “SKKN” trademark infringement

Kim Kardashian sued over “SKKN” trademark infringement

A tiny business has filed a lawsuit against Kim Kardashian, alleging trademark infringement on her part.

Kim K is being sued for trademark infringement in relation to her new brands, “SKKN” and “SKKN BY KIM,” according to documents obtained by TMZ. The Brooklyn-based company Beauty Concepts is the one filing the case; it claims to be the owner of the rights to “SKKN+” and that Kim’s use of “SKKN” is confusing consumers.

According to the lawsuit, Kim’s identical branding this year forced Beauty Concepts, a Black and woman-owned company, to fight its way through the pandemic.

The business is said to have gotten in touch with Kim’s agents to let them know that they had the trademark rights to “SKKN+,” but they were ultimately ignored, so Kim went ahead and launched her own line nevertheless.

But in response, Kardashian’s attorney Rhodes  – who defended the family in the recent Blac Chyna case – claim they did try to engage with Ms. Lunsford and Beauty Concepts LLC to come to an agreement.’We applaud Ms. Lunsford for being a small business owner and following her dreams,’ it says, in part, in Rhodes’ response. ‘But that doesn’t give her the right to wrongfully claim that we’ve done something wrong.’

Rhodes later added: ‘Several times we reached out to Beauty Concepts, trying to find a sensible path to coexistence. We pointed out that running a small esthetician business in Brooklyn does not give it the right to shut down a global skincare line.’

Building on independent research and development, her company filed a trademark application for “SKKN BY KIM” to protect the new branded products. This prompted the current shakedown effort.”

Rhodes claimed the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Beauty Concepts’ own “SKKN+” mark due to “skkn” meaning “skin”.

In the original cease-and-desist letter that was obtained by TMZ, Beauty Concepts claimed that it operates a website and social media account using the same block letters as Kardashian’s brand, and that it applied to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office back in March to register the SKKN+ logo.

The company stressed that it had put a lot of time and effort into building their brand over the past three years, and were now concerned that Kardashian’s brand would cause confusion in the marketplace.

At the time, Kardashian’s lawyer responded to TMZ saying: ‘We certainly appreciate and support small businesses, and our hat is off to Ms. Lunsford. But the question at hand is one of trademark law and we’ve not done anything deserving of legal action by her.’

Adding: ‘We are disappointed that she has chosen to run to the media knowing that we were scheduling a call for tomorrow, requested by her attorney. So while disagreeing with the letter, we’re hopeful that we can smooth things over once both sides speak.’

“SKKN” has been plagued by questions of legitimacy ever since its launch. Fans questioned whether Kim copied the name off Aussie influencers Emilee and Amy Hembrow, who already have a skin clinic called “SSKIN”.



Stay Connected , follow us on: Facebook: @creebhillsdotcom, Twitter: @creebhillsblog, Instagram: @creebhills, Pinterest: @creebhills Telegram: creebhills

To place an advert/sponsored post on our site, contact us via creebhillsads@gmail.com
Previous articleWimbledon 2022: Serena Williams, 40, loses to 24-year-old Harmony Tan in three-hour first-round clash
Next article“I had the best three years of my life in prison” – Mike Tyson
Pro Blogger, Online Content Developer with over 3 years of experience

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here