Ubi Franklin has stirred conversation online after sharing his perspective on why many men hesitate to opt for court marriages, pointing to widespread misconceptions about divorce and financial loss.
Taking to his social media page, the talent manager addressed what he described as a common but inaccurate belief that legally binding marriages automatically lead to a 50–50 split of assets in the event of a divorce.
According to him, this fear has discouraged many men from formalizing their relationships through the legal system.
“Many men are scared of court marriage because they have this erroneous fixation that in the event of divorce, property will be shared 50–50,” he wrote, stressing that this is not an accurate reflection of how the law works.
Franklin explained that asset division in divorce cases is not a blanket rule and depends on several legal considerations, including contributions, circumstances of the marriage, and other factors assessed by the court.
He also pointed out that financial obligations are not exclusive to court marriages. In his view, even customary unions can come with legal consequences if certain conditions are met.
“Even in customary marriages, when one of the spouses meets the conditions for alimony, the court will grant it,” he added, suggesting that avoiding court marriage does not necessarily shield individuals from financial responsibilities after separation.
Beyond asset division, Franklin highlighted another concern he believes contributes to the hesitation around legal marriages — the issue of gifts exchanged during relationships.
He noted that once a gift is given to a partner, it typically cannot be reclaimed after a breakup, except when specific conditions were attached at the time of the gift.
“Sometimes buy the gift in your own name or attach conditions to it,” he advised, offering a practical approach for those concerned about losing high-value items.
His comments have since generated mixed reactions online, with some agreeing that misconceptions about marriage laws often shape people’s decisions. In contrast, others argued that emotional and cultural factors play an equally significant role.
The discussion also reflects a broader shift among younger Nigerians in how they approach relationships and marriage, with greater attention to legal frameworks, financial implications, and long-term security.
By addressing these concerns directly, Franklin’s remarks have added a legal and practical angle to an ongoing conversation about modern relationships and the realities behind marriage choices.
